The intention of the following description is not to tire the readers with irrelevant facts about non-existing barrows in a tiny village. Rather, I want to show through these stories something interesting about the historical continuation and illustrate the previous blog Megalithic Marvels with some practical examples and folklore.
Once upon a time there were at least ten burial mounds in the parish of Varpelev, but they have all been destroyed, and have disappeared. In the map below, one can see where at least some of those holy barrows were once located.
It is worth noticing they all were situated near the river or the main road, additionally on top of natural ridges. It was impossible not to to notice them, while sailing by on the river or travelling by the road, which was according to the plan.
The intention was not to hide the dead away. They were a part of the tribe, just as the living were.
Klaus Ebbesen: Gravhøjenes mennesker, 1989. Translation: Author
The other explanation for the location near traffic routes is the fact that rivers and roads were sacred. Therefore all the holy barrows would be situated near these other already sacred places, so that the holy effect of all the holy things would accumulate and spread. The burial mounds were considered to protect roads, rivers, travellers and fords with their holy power.
Where the Trolls Dwelled
North of the village, at the roadside, there were three barrows near each other on the both sides of the road. They were all round barrows and were used as burial places from the Stone Age to the Bronze Age. An archeological exploration was done there in 1900 with a statement about the first barrow:
Seriously damaged. According to the informant, there had been a burial mound. It was evened out in around 1850, and in the same time crocks with ashes, burnt bones and a bronze sword were found.
Det Kulturhistoriske Centralregister: Fund og fortidsminder. Translation: Author
About the two other barrows, it was stated in 1900:
A plot with two barrows evened out. Nothing left. (Ibid.)
However, bronze items and urns were found at the plot. The names of the all three barrows seem to be forgotten, but at least one of them was called the 'Gravne' Mound (
Gravnehøj) in the literature, whatever it may mean:
In Varpelev there were some mounds, where the trolls dwelled [...] Gravne Mound.
Local historian Anna Pedersen: 1917. Translation: Author
I believe this was the barrow on the western side of the road, while one of the eastern barrows has been the North Mound (
Nordhøj), because the farm next to them is called the same. In the old times the roads and the farms were always named after the adjacent mounds. This indicates their importance.
There were one barrow on the left western side of the road and two on the right eastern side.
Actually even the Christian peasants had a very special relationship with the barrows next to their farms, despite the fact there was a furious church opposition against the megalithic culture. The peasants no longer understood that their ancestors were buried in the barrows, but they could not help feeling that there lived some nice and helpful beings in the barrows.
Those creatures had to be treated well, for otherwise they could ruin the fortune and the prosperity of the farm. The barrows were taken care of exemplarily, and the holy hawthorns on top of the barrows were given food and drink sacrifices still in the 20th century. If the beings in the barrow were happy, everthing was going fine at the farm, in the same way as before the Christianity, when the ancestors in the barrows took care of their descendants and the other way around.
Treasures in the Light of the Moon
Pors Munch (1626-1668) was the protestant parson in Varpelev, and in 1667 he was asked about the ancient local monuments. He told there existed only one burial mound, namely The Silver Mound (
Sølvhøj):
Regarding the burial mounds, the kinds with stones, there is only one left and it is called the Silver Mound.
Inger M. Boberg: Stevns gravhøje i sagnoverlevering, 1931. Translation: Author
However, maybe the parson, living in another village, didn't know Varpelev well enough? It is also amazing that he tells nothing about all the other barrows, which he should have passed every time he travelled to the village for the High Mass. Maybe he believed they belonged to the adjoining parish?
A natural shallow ridge where the Silver Mound once stood.
The Silver Mound was a round barrow from the Stone Age. An archeological exploration was done there in 1900 with the statement:
A mound, the Silver Mound was evened out by taking of gravel a long time ago. Seriously damaged.
Det Kulturhistoriske Centralregister: Fund og fortidsminder. Translation: Author
At that point, it was not entirely forgotten, because the neighbouring yard is named after it and it is mentioned twice in the literature in the beginning of the 20th century. However, it had been destroyed about a hundred years before, because it does not exist in a map from year 1835.
John Bauer for Alfred Smedberg's: Trollen och tomtepojken, 1909
The name of the mound suggest there could have been a folklore around it, as around other barrows with a prefix of noble metals. Silver leads one to think about a treasure. It was a general idea, or actually an old remembrance, there were huge treasures hidden in the barrows. Often this was true, for in old times the dead got the most valuable things with them in the burial mounds. Later on as well, at times of war or danger, people hide their articles of value in the barrows, which were the only safe place at the time.
There are numerous folklores describing so called
treasure barrows and optical phenomenons around them. Mysterious nocturnal lights were seen around mounds, and people believed it was caused by the mound dwellers airing their treasures in the moonlight. Additionally, one could sometimes hear how the cover of a treasure chest was slammed.
The Swallow Mound
South-East of the Silver Mound, another prehistorical barrow was situated, directly translated as the Swallow Mound (
Svalehøj). I have no idea where the name comes from. However, it is possible that
svale could refer to a male name Svale rather than a swallow. An archeological exploration was done there in 1900 with the statement:
A mound, the Swallow Mound [/Svale's Mound] was evened out by taking of gravel a long time ago. Seriously damaged. (Ibid.)
The place where the Swallow Mound once was located. One can sense a gently sloping terrain in front of the firs.
The Swallow Mound is mentioned only once in literature in the beginning of the 20th century by Inger M. Boberg, and it is not drawn in a map since 1835. However, suprisingly its name is preserved in another connection: The road next to the mound is called Swallow Mound's Road, and the neighbouring yard is named after it.
The Royal Dynasty
Part of the treasures found in Thorkel's Mound.
Thorkel's Mound (
Thorkelhøj) next to Thingstead Yard cannot be found in literature, but there were archeological explorations at the place in 1877 and in 1900. In 1877 the museum made a drawning of the mound. Most of the discoveries are from the Roman Iron Age, but originally the round barrow was from the Stone Age:
A gravel pit, where we discovered forty finds. There had been a natural ridge at the place, but it was taken away in time. According the informant nothing had been found after 1880.
Det Kulturhistoriske Centralregister: Fund og fortidsminder. Translation: Author
All the dead had some specials skills, but not everybody could be buried in the holy barrows. It was absolutely essential to know who laid in which mound. Therefore the names of the barrows named after a person are preserved through thousands of years to this day.
Note the Thingstead Yard and Thingsted Road next to Thorkel's Mound. A thingstead was always an important place in the whole district. An insignificant person would not be buried at such an area.
Part of the treasures found in Thorkel's Mound.
Here we have a male name Thorkel, and we can play with the thought that he really was buried in Thorkel's Mound. Only extraordinary persons could get this kind of elevated burial, so Thorkel must have been important either while living, or — in death.
Those who died for others, for their tribe, homestead, land or religion, owned a kind of holy power after their dead. [...] The same kind of power as those, who were sacrificed to gods for the public good as martyrs.
Mads Lidegaard: Danske høje fra sagn og tro, 1998. Translation: Author
There were certainly many who received a mound burial for their bravery towards dead. However, if Thorkel wasn't a martyr, he might have been the ancestor of ancestors, the founder of the village. Such an elevated person will automatically achieve the respect of the living.
There is only a little bulge left on the field of the great Thorkel's Mound.
Thorkel could as well have been a local chief. In the old days, a chief of the village didn't only have the worldly, but also the spiritual authority. A Nordic lord had to be a contact person between the gods and the people. He was responsible for there being corn on the fields and fish in the sea. He had to win the battles and so maintain peace. He had to take care of weather being good. Additionally, the Nordic lord had to be just, rich, handsome, athletic, articulate and clairvoyant. His hands and touch had to be healing. In other words, it was not easy to become a chief, but if it happened, it was likely his son would inherit this position.
The River Valley was actually the place of the first kings in the country:
The power triangle of the first king dynasties.
The graves of the first [..] kings are the rich graves of the kings of Stevns. There was a king dynasty that moved a bit later close to Lejre, which could be more easily defended.
Mads Lindegaard: Danske høje fra sagn og tro, 1998. Translation: Author
A local chief or a tribal king was buried in Varpelev. He had his whole household and slaves buried alive with him [...He] must be seen as a representative of the country's oldest kings.
Lone Hvass: Oldtiden i Danmark: Jernalderen, 2001. Translation: Author
Part of the treasures found in Thorkel's Mound.
There is also a third possibility. If Thorkel was not a martyr or a king, he could have been a holy man or a shaman. That kind of person would surely receive a fine burial place, owing to his healing ability and religious power. The descendants would share his holy powers by worshipping his burial mound.
The Fire Mound and the Great Cult Site
Flaming pillars at a barrow.
There have been massive megalithic Stone Age structures next to the Mound Yard's still existing Great Mound (
Maglehøj), which sadly nowdays belongs to the next parish. The foremost of the burial mounds was called the Fire Mound (
Ildhøj).
I presume the name has something to do with the folklore about flaming pillars: Always when elves were celebrating, their mound came open, rose up and stood on flaming pillars. It is also possible that fire in the name points out to the barrow's use as a place for bonfires, either for warning or for celebration.
A reconstruction of the Fire Mound at a museum.
The Fire Mound was located a shot from the Great Mound. Nowdays it is merely called the Stone Pile. It was damaged for ages ago. Still in last summer stones were blown up there and transported to the bridge over the Tryggevælde river, [where they were used as building material for the railway and the road]. Many bones and other artefacts were found at the Fire Mound. Now only the undermost stones are standing at the burial place.
Parson P. Holm in 1823 for the Royal Commission for Preservation of Archeological Findings. Translation: Author
Some of the items found on the floor at the Fire Mound: Amber pearls, white burned flintstone and sacrificial crocks. Køge Museum
Archeological explorations in 1991 at this place found remnants of an Iron Age burial place and at least two Stone Age mounds. Skeletons, flintstone tools, arrow heads, stone tiles, white burned flintstone, sacrificial crocks and traces of settlement (or a cult house?) were found. Almost all of the thousands of items were burned before the burial. It was calculated that the total diameter of the mound was 20 meters and the chamber was 19 m
2, thus the biggest mound in the river valley.
Modern plow traces on a field nearby the Fire Mound.
Additionally, ritual plow traces were found under the barrow. They were parallel and systematic. The Earth was identical with Mother Earth, and therefore these kinds of plow traces were considered as her holy feminine fathom, while the plow itself was masculine. Together they unite in a holy cosmic marriage. No evil spirit could cross plow traces as it is explained in many folklores. Before the barrow was built, the earth under the it was ritually plowed and burned for purification. This would give energy, protection and strength for the mound.
It seems like these destroyed structures had been a part of some kind of large cult center together with the Great Mound.
The Great Mound alone at twilight
The Great Mound is also called a
passage grave, in Danish a giant's dwelling (
jættestue). Many burial mounds are named as Giant's cave, Giant's grave or Giant's Tomb. These names were invented by people of later times, who couldn't see how normal human beings could been able to built the megaliths. They were convinced that only giants with supernatural powers could have constructed them. For a long time it was believed there were giants buried in the barrows, for no human could be as tall and big as the barrows are.
To be continued in a subsequent blog.